If she has an address listed then maybe she will be ok being contacted and welcome the gesture.
I can appreciate people being delighted at someone getting in touch again - a schoolfriend sent a birthday message via SM and months later (when I eventually saw it) I was delighted she did and we have been in touch since and I am very glad she sent that initial message.
I’m also glad she then left it up to me rather than repeated attempts though.
In the same inbox as the lovely birthday message was a message from another classmate that began ‘Not sure how to say this but I’ve always been able to follow you’
Maybe he was just wanting to reconnect too (as I would have been easy to follow in the press/SM previously due to work) and worded it badly but there were other messages too so I blocked him and was quite frightened by it.
What he (presumably) doesn’t know is that I escaped an abusive relationship, police involved, whole family moved house and in genuine fear for my life and DC, online stalking - and that is not as uncommon as we might wish to believe.
So I can appreciate being delighted as with my female friend’s single positive message, and being quite terrified as with the male classmate’s creepily worded and repeated messages.
Not everyone who pulls up the drawbridge is ‘precious’ or ‘stuck-up’ or even unfriendly.
Sometimes we are scared, and for good reason need to be careful. That doesn’t need to mean shut off forever but it can mean being wary of repeated messages or the wording.
MN is usually on the ball recognising this and I’m not sure why this thread has been so fractious.
A simple, honest and non-creepily worded message with no pressure might be just what we need, but there may be good reasons why we can’t/don’t want to respond, and both positions are equally possible and understandable.