MmeLaraque
Bippityboo2
I'm sorry you had that happen. The same thing could have happened to my daughter, and probably would have had she been my first. DD2 was breech and a c-section and my milk hadn't come in by day 5 and I could tell her nappies were drier, so I sent my partner out for some formula much to the chagrin of the community midwife despite losing 8% of her birth weight. She guzzled it, poor baby was starving. I was 36 by that point and I have a big gap between my 2, had it have been my first child at 22 I would've listened to what the 'experts' said and wouldn't have questioned it. My milk came in on day 12, 3 days after her due date.
DD2 is 3.5 now and very tall for her age, she is Autistic, which is a challenge in itself, but I often wonder if those early days contributed.
Breast is best is forced upon us, and in most cases it is, but with the best will in the world it isn't always possible. You are not to blame, and I know that sounds trite, the medical professionals who failed to listen are. Hugs.
"I often wonder if those early days contributed."
Autism is neurological. Something people are born with. So no, those early days didn't contribute to your kid's autism.
**
There is actually extensive evidence now that hypernatraemic dehydration (usually 2nd to breastfeeding difficulties) gives a 17 fold increased risk of autism. This was based on research from over 100,000 babies in Sweden. I am certain it was relevant in my child’s case and it is also my biggest regret that the medical staff around us did not seem to care about her jaundice/weight loss/dry nappies.