[quote donewithitalltodayandxmas]@Blibbyblobby I didn't say about lack if caution , what I said is I wouldn't write if the other 5 based on the one
I always have my guard up, if you met me you know in rl I would challenge sexism there and then , I am not afraid to speak up. I have gone to defence of a women being abused by a partner and put myself in the middle of it.
But I wouldn't look at those 6 puppies and say get rid of them all because one of thems a bad one
[/quote]
You said "view my sons as violent thugs because they have been born as boys"
Not get rid of, view as.
So it is the same thing as treating all the puppies as if they might bite.
It's safer for any woman to treat an unknown man as a man who might be violent than a man who never would, because the cost of being wrong that way is hurt feelings for a man, but the cost of being wrong the other way is an attacked or dead woman.
The people (I'm speaking generally here, not specifically about donewithitalltodayandxmas) who say - "meh, it's all sexist, misandry from women to men and misogyny from men to women, it's all just as bad" are only thinking about the relative injustice of the misogynist/misandrist act or statement, not the social context and power imbalance in which it happens, nor the asymmetric costs of getting it wrong.
So in the same theme, the fact that men pose a greater risk of stranger violence to men then they do to women is true. But the impact of that risk on women as a class - the unofficial curfews, the smiling at strangers so they don't escalate, the way many of us restrict our lives that men don't - is greater. Not all men, but the actions of the men that do impact all women in a way that is not true of male on male violence.
Just in case I'm not clear: I am 100% ok with prioritising women's autonomy and safety over men's hurt feelings.