@justab0utsurviving
Maybe they should have had different expectations. If they had taken the position - we are going to get shit press from tbe tabloids no matter what we do so let's just ignore it, then maybe they wouldn't have seen it as such a big deal. It's like they were surprised at the criticism from the media. I am not suggesting the tabloids were right - they are awful for what they do to people but surely he knew as a senior royal he would be under the microscope? That he would be scrutinised at every step. It would have eased off as the press got bored. But as I said earlier - the stories were all about her family and the fued and the court cases.
The thing is, I don't support media intrusion (obviously), but I find it a bit disingenuous to claim that they had it much worse than anyone else.
Comparing how Kate got treated after ten years is not the same as how she was treated initially - mobbed on her way to work by photographers, Waity Katie, cruel comparisons to her sister, horrible headlines about her family... Etc
I mean, did Meghan ever face a headline as obscenely cruel as Duchess of Pork?
I'm not denying the racist elements. I'm not saying that the press SHOULD be this cruel to anyone. But I'm a bit
at the short term memories people seem to have at press behaviour, and the false comparisons between when Kate was well established on the scene vs Meghan's reception.
And that's on Harry. He's had a front row seat, and he's had a PR machine working for him for years to sand off the rough edges. He is the one who should have understood the situation better, and should have worked a more graceful way out of it.
(personally I've always found him to be a bit of a twat though)