@Whatwouldscullydo
Its not women reducing women to dresses and make up
I'm not talking about dresses or makeup, I'm talking about comments like these from PPs:
obviously male purely based on height, jaw line & waist/hip ratio
Cool, so very tall women with big jaws and narrow hips should just fuck off then.
be it how they carry themselves, their body structure, their voice.
... and add women with unfeminine posture, body shape or voice to that list, too.
It is extremely easy to tell the sex of a person just by looking at them, and especially if they move or speak.
Not according to the reports of non-feminine presenting women I've seen who've been harassed for not looking 'like a woman' despite being what we'd call a butch lesbian 10 years ago.
So regardless of whether trans people 'pass' or not, this approach to GC women suddenly regarding themselves as fucking biological-sex-sniffer-dogs is a) weird as fuck and b) relies on a very specific visual reference for what a woman is. Which even if you're only arsed about XX women and take the entire trans argment out of it, is a fucking strange and restrictive way to view what is or isn't acceptably womanly.