it’s a protected characteristic and therefore if YOU discriminate you are breaking the law. See?
I don't think your tone matches your understanding of the law. Exceptions in the EA allow discrimination in some circumstances, obviously in the case of sport for sex, but also for privacy.
If you think trans women should not go in women’s toilets, where do you suggest trans men go? Genuine question.
More unisex facilities are necessary for a variety of people for a variety of reasons. This is not a difficult problem to solve.
if you think that the only thing that would allow a predatory male access to a woman to assault her is wearing women’s clothes you are deluded.
Again, your tone is not appropriate given your lack of knowledge of the subject. The logical conclusion of changes to the law is not men using women's facilities, but the complete loss of single sex facilities. There is no requirement for anyone to change anything about their appearance or behaviour to be trans, or even to claim to be male or female.
If you think that trans women are living through all they have to live through, just to get into women’s toilets, you are utterly ridiculous. Just take a look at yourselves.
Again, your knowledge of the topic seems dated. There is currently no objective definition of 'trans woman' and there is no need to identify as either male or female to be trans.