[quote Countdowntonothing]@TheSunIsStillShining
The number of cases doesn't actually matter, a lot will be mild or asymptomatic. What matters is the death toll and hospitalization figures. Once enough people have been vaccinated, the death toll and number of hospitalizations should drastically reduce. Then, even though there will still be transmission, the risk of severity will be drastically reduced and we should be able to reduce restrictions. [/quote]
I don't agree. Infection rates matter as long as you don't have all (E)CV and CV ppl + over60? vaccinated. That is somewhere around 20m if I remember correctly,
If:
we have constant and level vacc supply to do 1m vaccination/week that is still 20 weeks. And at week 12 we have to start over. so from w12 the new vacc /week will be only 500k (just estimate), meaning that the last 8m (by JCVI the under 40 CV pop mostly) will take twice as much time. So instead of the initial 20 weeks it''ll be more along the lines of 28 weeks. And they will have to keep going on a rolling basis. So looking at June/July
And this is a best case scenario. Given how they have literally fucked up everything so far are you surprised that I don't have blind faith in them to do this properly?
Again: without knowing even how many vacc and in what intervals are coming into the country it is nothing more than a wishing game.
and back to infection rates: it matters as even asymptomatic/mild cases can result in long covid. Putting further and constant strain on nhs.
Plus, whilst infection numbers are high cv pop are still very much at risk. And they have kids, jobs,... but if there is a false sense and hope of everything'll be fine jack, than they will be in an even worse position than now.
What is totally true in any case that atm the priority is to help not collapse the NHS. But let's face it: it's at the brink because everything has been so mishandled.