@dreamingbohemian
Swing voters in the US are not more informed than anyone else. It's just that their primary interests are not uniformly on one side of the party divide or the other.
Yes. But then need more than your rosette to vote for - ideally some policy they quite like.
Not ignoring the majority that didn't vote for the winner is probably a good place to start, if you want to encourage informed political debate.
In days of yore that was accomplished by the inculcation of the weakest of senses of civic duty in enough people to generally keep the train grinding along the track.
But now we've decided that was a bit too elitist, we're left with having to find other ways. Personally I like sortition, but in a good example of how difficult change is, even if everyone on this thread agreed (and they won't) it would still never happen.
One thing wars and revolutions can achieve - at horrendous cost - is to eliminate the vested interests that tend to strangle moves to equality.
However, evern writing that, in England, which has seen countless wars, civil wars and religious revolution, the vested interests are pretty much what they were in 1066. Which was the last time we had what my DF would call "pulito piazza"