maureenfrombarnsley How can you possibly presume to state what "they" think? Have you spoken to all of them? You insist you're in favour of protests, yet continue to denigrate the participants, even when people have explained to you the perfectly valid reasons for their position
Well it would be helpful if they gave some indication of what they think themselves wouldn't it. Do they have a website, some kind of manifesto. A solution
I haven't denigrated them. I've repeatedly said they have a right to peaceful protest, within the law, and that their voices should be heard
The only reasonable certainty one can draw is they don't agree with lockdown. Lots of people don't. To my original point, if everyone agreed with you, we wouldn't NEED draconian laws and fines because the majority would choose to act in their own interest and stay in.
I think what you're saying is that people should be left to decide for themselves?
By your own logic you most definitely are a recession denier because you are in favour of the very measures which cause it, therefore you must be in denial (you must see how easy it is to invert your 'covid-denier' rationale?)
But letting this damn virus run free would destroy the economy as well. Not only that, it would collpase vital services
Your critique of The WHO makes my point for me. 9 months on and there is absolutely NO consensus. All the more justification for rigorous debate.
I agree, yes debate.
There is consensus on lockdown. Most countries are using very similar tactics. Even Sweden has now had use stricter lockdown. This is science based. I dont see how all these scientists, the world over, can be wrong