There is a difference in the permanence of the way people see, and deal with, the world. If, from the safety of a supportive loving home, they encountered some name chanting in the playground, they may or may not be resilient, and may or may not remember it.
Others are miles away from this situation. They are likely to describe themselves as 'bully magnets' because they are not equipped with the same assumptions about what to expect from the world. (Someone born with missing limbs or sight may get along fine, but they just don't experience the same world as others. Prolonged extreme abuse from infancy leaves a similar gap in knowledge of how others deal with things)
They may be resilient, hardworking, and apparently successful, kind and cheerful, and usually will be extremely responsible and devoted towards their own DC, but nevertheless may look at the world differently. That may be their personal 'normal default setting', if they knew absolutely nothing except abuse of every kind, entirely undefended and un-befriended, beginning at birth as an unwanted/resented/detested baby, and continued from every abuser who had the chance, throughout childhood and early adult life.
(This is the life people believe is advisable, by being dogmatically opposed to abortion of hated babies)
In any future circumstances where no matter how they try, they have no control, even in something as petty as being denied a form, or an appointment, they are at a loss, because their competencies don't include the default assumptions other people share. They don't have any expectation, let alone certainty, they can wrench power from bullies (minor or serious,) who want to harm them.
N.B. They are 'non-state-torture survivors', not suited to being branded mentally ill, to be fixed by drugs or forced to remember and discuss details of the past, any more than a concentration camp survivor or someone who had his arm chopped off by torturers.
It wasn't acceptable, once, for people to speak their truths. Silencing them protected sentimentalists, who preferred to believe in a fantasy pink candyfloss world where nasty things cannot be possible. That, in turn, protected paedophiles and wife beaters, and rapists.
A market exists for U.K. men to direct live online SA of infants (mainly in an overseas country with explosive increases in population, based on religious dogma) Some infants are born for the purpose, and are 'working' under the supervision of their mothers. (I would cross reference to the 'sex work' is just a way to earn money' thread) Choosing to think it impossible is sentimentality. Choosing later to call such children crazy if ever they tell the truth, is not sensible.