Oh well.. your assumption is wrong.
Well it's not, is it, because you were the one who commented that people will think she's their nan.
She doesn’t have lots of time though does she. She’s 50. Not 20/30
She'll likely live until her children are 40, maybe 50.
They aren’t even born and shes already having to look at the possibility of buying in paid help to raise her children as she will be too knackered as she’s to old to do it herself
I got the impression that's because she's a single mum having twins, not because she's sooooooo OLD!!! Some much younger mums have commented here that they'd have loved a nanny.
You seem to be labouring under the rather narrow minded misapprehension that young mum = bag of energy and older mum = so knackered she'll just go "poof"
I hope she has a shed load of money so the twins don’t end up having to wipe her ass and Care for her in their 20s when they should be living life
But wiping her arse at say, 40 or 50, when they're likely raising a family themselves, would be fine.
Can anyone answer me this: why is ageism on MN so widely accepted? Why, when someone mentions a middle aged woman doing anything with her life other than knitting, gardening and being invisible, do people practically vomit? Anyone?