[quote LolaSmiles]**@LolaSmiles it's for two fucking months with the bulk of it in 2 weeks. God how depressing women still think like this. No wonder so bang men act like entitled kings
Yes, TWO MONTHS.
So because the OP, her mum and siblings don't sort out an appropriate arrangement, the OP's daughter should have two months away from her mother (and sibling I think), the OP's partner should stop doing his job that allows for the family to structure their home life as they do.
It's a bloody insult saying my ideas are why men are entitled kings! I'm all in favour of men not being feckless man children with both parents sharing earning, parental leave, childcare and domestic duties equally, but the OP chose not to have that set up. The OP and her DP have both chosen to structure their family with one person earning and working long hours, and the other being a SAHP. Expecting one person to take everything on because the other person's family won't find a workable solution is unreasonable.
Is the OP going to be happy if her DP loses his job? Will the family manage financially? Will her siblings be all rallying round in the event her family situation changes (in part due to siblings not doing their share)? Does she feel confident her DP could get another job should the worst happen? Does she have enough earning power to get back into the workplace and fill the gap?
Unfortunately if you choose to structure your family in a way that places all financial responsibilities on one partner then you do so accepting the pros and cons.[/quote]
Exactly. I think a lot of people are taking a very simplistic view of things.
In a lot of industries this certainly isn’t the time to be taking extra time off