FeckOffCup1
flaxmeadow as far as I know no one is saying that lockdown measures don’t cause infections to slow down. What people are saying is that, unless you get the infections down to zero during a lockdown, lockdown is only ever pressing ‘pause’.
Lockdown is slowing the virus spread. So that the services can cope
As soon as you relax restrictions rates go straight back up again and will continue to do so until there is a vaccine.
The point of easing lockdowns for a while is to help the economy and test the waters to see what happens. It's a balance between health and the economy
At the moment there is no sign of a vaccine being ready and people simply can’t stay locked down forever.
This is why we heavy lockdown and light lockdown. Rolling lockdowns for however long it takes because unfortunately at the moment, this is thebonly way to deal with it. We were told this right from the start. Not just in the UK but across the world
At some point you have to balance the damage lockdown is doing to the economy, to mental health, to education etc with the damage CV is doing to people’s health and the NHS.
Peoples physical and mental health would also suffer if the services collapse under the strain of too many with covid requiring services
I don’t know what the answer is. But, from my POV at least, the government doesn’t know any better either so I’m not going to follow the rules that they are enforcing and not following themselves.
This does bit make sense. No govt understands the virus completely yet. The only way to save services is lockdowns. There is no other way ATM
I am doing what I think is best for me and my family in exactly the same way the government is doing what is best for themselves
So you dont care if services become overwhelmed. If you cant phone an ambulance or the police? Cany get medical attention?