"The pack tells teachers: “Hold your nerve! Not all combinations will be easy to discuss and some might seem impossible. The aim is to get people talking and to limit assumptions about what kind of sex people have. Every combination is worthy of a conversation!” "
I'm old. I'm 51. This is the part of the pack that boggles my mind. Because it's not just about starting a nice healthy discussion around pleasurable sex acts, it's verging on encouraging fantasy. Tentacle porn anyone? I mean, that's an object right? Maybe throw in some marketing for where the young-uns can buy some interesting toys to help them overcome their "limits" - cos it's all just good fun you know.... and if you don't feel comfortable with it, well, obviously, there's something wrong with you......
I'm all for proper sex education, and in my book this ain't it. I agree with PPs that this is focussed way too much on the exotic and not enough on the fact that girls are being looked at primarily as receptacles for men's pleasure, rather than sex being a mutually enjoyable experience between two people who at the very least care about and respect each other.
I am not a prude. I have experimented, I have had good and bad experiences - as an adult, in my own time. As a teen in the 80s even at an all girls school I would have curled up and died if I'd had to participate in an exercise like this. Some of my classmates would have thoroughly enjoyed the power of being cool with it though.
And there's the discussion that should be had before body parts are discussed in sexual context. People use sex as a power play - yes, I know BDSM is a safe space for this - different discussion and not relevant to this one - and often it is male power over females (though not exclusively). Helping girls feel powerful enough to say no is a big big part of this, plus helping them articulate their feelings and desires with a partner about sex. If the clitoris doesn't seem to matter, it really speaks volumes about the angle of this game.
OP YANBU in the slightest.