"21:53TooTrueToBeGood
That's quite random.
Not in the slightest. It's an extremely common justification/defense used by men who control their partners. It doesn't excuse their controlling behaviour, no matter how much they think it does, and it doesn't excuse yours either."
But it does, I'm their parent, not their partner. I'm supposed to have some control I'm responsible for their safety. You cant compare a parents responsibility with men controlling their wives. That's quite weird and extreme.
"'m not a man, I'm a woman, and they are children, not adults. As a parent I should have some control, no?"
"You are meant to be their parent, not their owner. You should be coaching, mentoring and educating them, not controlling them. There is also a difference between "some control" and knowing their every move in real time."
I never said I was their owner. It's for their safety and its helped massively. And as I've already said, I dont look at it constantly. Who said I'm not coaching and mentoring them? That's quite strange to jump to massive conclusions.
"How good would it be if missing children had trackers?!"
"Now you're using the most extreme, most unlikely and worst case scenario to justify your behaviour"
I dont need to justify having a tracker on my kids, not to you, or anyone. I could presume you have been in that scenario where a man was controlling you, which maybe has caused you to make comparisons like this.
"Very, very few children go missing and most of those that do either do so of their own choice or are abducted and in either situation the phone would be discarded at the earliest opportunity."
I think you would be surprised how many children go missing, there is a paedophile virtually in every street. And yes, I've had safeguarding training, so know stuff a lot of parents dont know.