AMemeByAnyOtherName
She isn't asking to talk about her experiences though is she?
Have people forgotten the premise of AIBU?
A poster states a position and then the entire concept is that people argue for or against - AIBU/AINBU
She has stated that white people can't experience racism - the entire point of posting in AIBU is to invite arguments for and against this.position.
If the thread had been "black people suffer racism" - then that's what the post will be about.
If she wanted to talk about racism and how it affects the black community then you don't post in AIBU which is a debating thread.
As for is she not allowed to want to focus on racism against black people - she can focus on it all she wants. That's entirely up to her.
She can't force me to focus only on racism against black people though and to me that is incredibly decisive. I want to see an end to racism. If the BLM movement is really only going to allow racism against black people to be discussed how do they see that panning out? Do they think our government will implement policies and law changes that affect or benefit only black people?
I watched a video last night where a black man in America was talking about what needs to change and he was adamant that this is not about racism alone. His view was very much that it's about money and power/influence too. That it's poverty that causes many of the problems that black people face (this is in America) and that that is where efforts should be focused first and foremost. Many people might disagree but it's an interesting discussion. His argument was that wealthy black Americans might still face racism but that their ability to fight it or to not be so affected by it is solely due to having money.
These are the discussions that I find most useful. Hearing about where changes can be made and the impact that they will have.
Just having "check your privilege" yelled at you makes not an iota of difference does it?