KKslider
Attributes related to ASD are not caused by parental laziness.
People with ASD (unless very severe) are not impervious to parental influence. ASD should therefore not be used as a cop out. People with ASD are not, and I have my own experience to bear here, some sort of alien. They do respond in their own way to the environment created for them by parents, and that includes the food environment.
Firstly, you're wrong to presume every autistic person with a restricted diet only eats 'junk food' (which, FYI, there is no such thing as junk food or good food or bad food. Food is just food)
Then you did not read my subsequent post. I have an ASD child who eats well. I am sure that luck played its part. I also think that good decision we made did as well, as I have said.
Secondly, the reason that a lot of people with sensory issues related to food prefer mass-produced processed foods is because they are bland, they're easy to chew/swallow, they have a uniform texture, a uniform taste, a uniform shape, and there are no unexpected surprises.
Which is why it is a good idea to keep them away from children as we did. Which is why it was fucking annoying to be told I was some sort of crank for doing just that.
And to come back to this line ("if junk wasn't an alternative"), DS had food issues from weaning before he even knew 'junk' existed. When he first began weaning he would become very distressed at the touch and taste of food and had nothing but milk until he was nearly 8m old because he wouldn't eat beyond the first bite of any meal. But yeah, I'm sure he was holding out for nuggets and chips.
I am sure there are exceptions. Maybe your child is one of them - I can't know. But to suggest that all children who refuse good food for junk is because of some reason like this is absurd.
crazychemist
Now, see that’s exactly what offends me ("if junk wasn't an alternative"). Why do you assume that junk is readily available? Not all picky eaters only eat junk. Not all picky eaters have ever had much junk. You’re making the assumption that everyone that has a child with issues around food has been a lazy parent that plonks pizza and chips on the table every night. That’s a lazy assumption to make. My life would be much easier if my picky eating DD would eat baked beans and pizza.
Why do I assume that junk is readily available? Is this serious?
I am sure that not all picky eaters eat junk. But the subject of this thread is problematic diet. This normally means people who eat limited diets, generally junk.
And if you want to play Offence Top Trumps, that's fine. I put up with nonsense because I objected to my young children being given rubbish, not as a treat, but as a routine thing by others. I saw (and see) other parents slagged off behind their backs for having the same standards - wierdos, cruel to their children, "they think their above us", giving their children "food for grown-ups", "no child truly likes that" and so on.
...and because of that, I reckon I get to throw some crap of my own around now. My children, one of whom is diagnosed ASD, are excellent eaters. As much as we could, we kept them away from rubbish when they were very young. We made sure they didn't latch on to particular things as children can when they have them too regularly. I made sure the cooking was tasty and varied. I got them involved with the cooking. And so on. I have just as much justification for being offended at being told that effort was all down to luck and I might as well have just got Macca's every night. My children like junk as much as the next child. That's fine, because they also appreciate healthy food, and are absolutely fine having it as an occasional treat.
I dislike the attitude that because a child now has a food condition (or SEN), there is nothing that the parent could have done at any time. That's an abdication of parental responsibility plain and simple. That's what I'm attacking. I am sure there are children who would have food issues anyway. Maybe your children are among them. I have no way of knowing. But it does nothing to refute my view that that number is probably quite small.