Do you know how best to not "accidentally" shoot someone?
Don't accost them, unprompted and unnecessarily, as a civilian, holding a gun.
Why are people so desperate for this to not have been a case of clear racism resulting in death?
What's the motive for wanting that not to be the case when all the evidence points at it being the case? I don't get it.
I've never been in that situation, and hope I never am, but my gut feeling is that they intended to beat him, but it turned into a struggle immediately.
This was so troubling to read.
Your gut feeling is that they were going to kick the shit out of him but because he struggled aka defended himself and tried to get away, they "accidentally" shot him three times?
You've wrapped up by saying you think it's awful and they're guilty. But why all the qualifications and mitigating factors?
Someone defending themselves and trying to get away is I suppose a "struggle" of sorts but that description is unnecessary and implies an equal footing.
He defended himself, attempted to get away and was shot to death. In the middle of a street in February. And they were not charged until now. Fuck me, how much more clear cut can a case be.