Plan this post is not for you, since it is clear you are beyond help at this point. Despite evidence to
the contrary, you seek to paint this as a natural phenomenon that could ‘happen anywhere’ and ignore the human errors behind it.
To everyone else, this FT article gives excellent coverage of WHO’s failures (which Plan admits!) and the pressure the WHO was under by Chinese officials. Of course, as Plan has signposted, it seems that the Chinese government will now throw the WHO under the bus to deflect blame. Guess the WHO should have remained more objective, no?
Here it is: www.ft.com/content/2a70a02a-644a-11ea-a6cd-df28cc3c6a68
Interesting tidbits:
Taiwan said its doctors had heard from mainland colleagues that medical staff were getting ill — a sign of human-to-human transmission. Taipei officials said they reported this to both International Health Regulations (IHR), a WHO framework for exchange of epidemic prevention and response data between 196 countries, and Chinese health authorities on December 31
December 31? Why, China only reported to the WHO that very day. Seems like maybe they didn’t give the whole story ....
Taiwanese government officials told the Financial Times the warning was not shared with other countries
China’s health ministry only confirmed human-to-human transmission on January 20, after the WHO said in mid-January there might be “limited” human-to-human transmission but stepped back from this view on the same day
Appears to me that the WHO tried to force China’s hand here.
The challenge of managing the relationship extended to negotiations over the wording of a report following a joint mission to China last month. The nine-day trip comprised 12 WHO experts and 13 Chinese officials and was focused on the country’s response to the outbreak. Three of the WHO officials also visited Wuhan, the centre of the outbreak, as part of the mission. The WHO’s Bruce Aylward, the Canadian epidemiologist who led the team, described the process as “fantastic”. But he told the FT there was “huge back and forth” with Chinese officials about what went into the report
A huge back-and-forth with Chinese officials...I wonder what they were discussing....
Dr Aylward said Chinese health officials did not want to refer to the pathogen as “dangerous” as they regarded such terminology as reserved for diseases with higher mortality rates
🤔
Clifford Lane, clinical director of America’s National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases who was one of two US officials on the mission, said the WHO team’s Chinese members had “a great desire to be precise”. He said the debates over wording did not amount to censorship but represented a “bit of spin”
Only a bit of spin ... with regards to a deadly pathogen. Absolutely disgusting.