university education is not a marker of intelligence - it just proves someone jumped through the necessary hoops.
But they are hoops that someone who has no academic attainment cannot jump through.
I’m not suggesting someone without an degree isn’t capable of attaining one. But it is the case that someone with a degree must have a certain level of attainment. They cannot be considered thick.
You don’t, it was a rubbish example.
According to UCAS you do. Or do you know better than the organisation who’s job it is to deal with university applications?
Law seems to be reading and digesting wodges of legal cases.
There is a little more to it than that. But entry requirements are also linked to the numbers of people who apply for the course. The more people who want to study the course, the higher the entry requirements.
If you have 3 Cs at A level you are unlikely to get on to a law degree course. But you may get on to an economics course. And certainly, if you are as thick as shit as evidenced by having no secondary qualification, you won’t get a place on either of them.
I can’t believe people are actually arguing that it is possible to gain a tertiary qualification if you are as thick as shit.