I have been asking for ways that Scotland are treated differently by Westminster to the rest of the UK, why do people get so uptight?
It’s not so much that Scotland gets treated differently as Westminster policies have a different impact in Scotland which isn’t considered, it considered relevant. This trickles down into companies and organisations that are very England centric because that’s where their head quarters are and where power is held.
Scotland as a nation has a very different ethos to the rest of the uk. There’s a strong committed to social good and social activism, for example free prescriptions, university tuition fees instead of large scale infrastructure projects. Our education system is completely different as are our term times etc. Our childcare and protection laws are different, our healthcare system is different, our very way of making and interpreting the law are different.
What that means in practice is, if you work for a uk wide organisation, you’ll likely spend a considerable amount of time explaining that xyz policy or decision won’t work in Scotland because of the legal/social implications. After a while it becomes incredibly frustrating to still be saying xyz won’t work (while you’re colleagues roll their eyes and tut).
By way of example I worked for a uk wide charity who repeatedly organised uk wide schools based competitions for times when Scottish schools were on holiday. When there was basically no uptake from schools (every single year) I was being told my staff needed to get into schools and engage with the staff and get them involved in the competition because it would look bad if Scotland wasn’t represented. The schools were closed. No one seemed to understand this and we went through the same rigmarole every year.
Now that’s one thing and not that important, but if that kind of lack of thought or awareness happens around most of what you do, including decisions made by Westminster you’re going to get pretty worn out banging that drum time after time.
A Westminster example would be immigration where Scotland’s position is diametrically opposed to Westminster - we have a falling birthdate and plenty of room, we need immigration to support population growth but the Westminster decisions re immigration don’t consider that and instead work on the basis of hostile environment.
I don’t necessarily agree that independence is the best way forward for Scotland but I totally understand the impetus.