Woolie Just because the articles are from US publications, doesn't mean they aren't worth reading. The first is by a Professor who has also been a UK government adviser on extremism, so worth a read. The second is by a journalist in London, writing for a US publication. The third is from the Times, which as far as I can see is quite neutral.
I didn't mention Jack Straw, it was a PP.
If the Aussies are concerned about UK access to Five Eyes in the case of a Corbyn government, which is what the Times article said at the start, then we should be listening very carefully to what they are saying.
You evidently don't want to expand your knowledge on defence and intelligence, and given we owe a lot of our security to the US from the Five Eyes to the massive contribution they make to NATO, which allows you to sleep safely at night, it might behove you to read the articles, which you obviously didn't from the times between my post and yours.
If you aren't going to engage in the discussion about legitimate concerns expressed by those in the defence and intelligence communities, then why bother being on here?