I have been reading this thread since last night. What occurs to me is a lack of empathy on the part of those saying they don’t have a problem with it. I am not talking about a shared loo shared by a few colleagues. I am talking about public loos.
As a very heavy period sufferer, I don’t want to be in a loo with men around while I might have to come out with blood on my hands - because you know, there is no paper and I don’t have anything because I have been caught out. I just don’t want to do this, I like my privacy, and why should I have to?
If I am in a single sex loo, I am more comfortable even if I have to wash blood off my hand (usually try to keep one clean to open door). Added bonus, I can ask for some loo paper to be flung over/under the door. Can’t do that with floor to ceiling doors and if I stand up to lean around the door to ask, I would be a much bigger mess. Anyone with flooding issues knows exactly what I mean.
So should I not leave the house then so I don’t encounter this. It is hard enough to leave the house as it is on those days.
What about when I take my elderly mum to a loo and there is no disabled loos. I need the door open to help her. What about her dignity and privacy? Or when dealing with small children if there is more than one and you cannot fit in a cubicle. There are plenty of other examples but they seem to be ignored by those who don’t seem to look beyond their own needs. But ok, you do you:
If someone with a penis feels unsafe in the male loo, I am all for a separate space for them. I feel that there is not enough definitive research that shows that them using my space is as safe as being for those with vaginas and children only. I think separate sex spaces are needed until this longitudinal research becomes available and probably some unisex spaces as well. This should not be a quick trigger decision to appease a very few.