As with opposition to sex work that isn't filmed, all the handwringers consistently and deliberately fail to understand that prohibitive, punitive approaches do a great deal more harm than good: stigma and criminalisation put far more people at risk than they 'protect.
FWIW the solution to trafficking is simply to allow free movement of people (whether or not those people want to have sex for money, or pick vegetables, or provide manicures etc).
The solution to individuals being decieved, ripped off or otherwise mistreated in porn is to subject it to the same regulations as any other workplace - fair pay, contracts that you can understand, risk assessment - and to treat any performer who complains of assault or fraud as, you know, a valid human being with a valid complaint, not a silly bitch who should have known better than to take up the work in the first place.
But we still have this massive, superstition-based cultural legacy of fear and dislike of recreational sex and of female sexual autonomy when the woman's choice isn't to refuse/avoid sex or only to exchange it for a wedding ring.