Meet the Other Phone. Flexible and made to last.

Meet the Other Phone.
Flexible and made to last.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

AIBU Disagreement on wedding seating

430 replies

RoyalnGeneral · 03/10/2019 08:52

Wedding one. Some details changed but I am not any of the four people involved.

I have a friend, Alice who suffers from anxiety (relevant). Alice got married to Ben about 18 months ago. Ben is a laid back ‘try to keep everyone happy’ type of guy. Alice and Ben are friends with another couple, Carl and Donna. Ben and Carl have been best friends for over 20 yrs. Alice and Donna worked together for several years but now work at different organisations.

Carl and Donna have announced they will be getting married next spring and Carl asked Ben to be his best man. Planning was going well until seating arrangements were discussed when it turned out Ben would be sitting at the top table while Alice would be at a guest table. Alice was upset and said she didn’t know anyone at the wedding and didn’t want to sit with strangers. She wanted to sit next to Ben at the top table.

Ben spoke to C&D and asked if Alice could sit with him. Carl and Donna said no, they understood it wasn’t ideal but that A&B would only be separated for a few hours. Alice said if she couldn't sit at the top table then she wanted Ben to sit at her guest table and do his speech from there. C&D refused again as they wanted Ben at the top table with Carl, so he could do the toasts/ read the messages/ keep people on time.

Things went back and forth without resolution, then last weekend Carl phoned Ben and uninvited him from being best man. A&B are still invited to the wedding and can now sit together at the guest table. The new best man will sit at the top table. The best man’s wife will be sitting with friends at another guest table.

Alice told me about this last night. She was taken aback that Ben had been uninvited. She said that at her wedding she hadn’t cared about wedding party only at the top table. What was important to her was that her guests felt comfortable and she didn’t think it was fair she had been expected to sit by herself with people she didn’t know.

I said that while Alice hadn't minded who sat at the top table at her wedding, Carl and Donna seem to want a more traditional approach. Also, C&D have accommodated Alice’s request to sit with Ben, although not in the way Alice expected. Carl will now have his best man with him at the top table, as he wants, and the best man’s wife will be sitting with people she knows, so perhaps it is the best compromise C&D can come up with, given the circumstances.

Alice disagreed. She said C&D are overreacting and she doesn’t see why she couldn’t been seated with Ben in the first place. She isn't sure she wants to go to the wedding now as she thinks it will be awkward.

AIBU to think Alice should have accepted C&D’s initial refusal and not continued to insist on sitting with Ben?

I know Alice’s anxiety means she finds these situations stressful so perhaps C&D could have been more sympathetic. But it’s C&D’s wedding day which I tend to think puts the onus on A&B to try to accomodate their friends' wishes.

OP posts:
emilybrontescorsett · 05/10/2019 19:57

This has brought back a memory for me. When good friends of ours got married, the best man was the groom's brother. His girlfriend at the time insisted on sitting next to him at the top table. She was a new girlfriend who had previously had an affair with one of the other, married guests, 😕 .
The relationship didn't last. I suppose the groom didn't want the fallout with his brother.

lottiegarbanzo · 07/10/2019 10:53

I am struck by the fact that none of the 'Alices' and 'Alice defenders' on the thread seem to have considered, for a moment, that other guests might also have wanted, even asked for, special treatment too. That Alice might not be the only special person in the room.

So, that giving in to Alice's 'one little request' and just being 'a little bit kind and flexible', might have set off a wave of upset and demands, from all the other people whose special preferences had already been denied, ignored or not shown that little bit of kindness - but that would, in total have changed the wedding from one thing, to something quite different and incoherent, as they'd all have been pulling in different directions.

It's not 'Alice vs the B&G' it's about the B&G looking after ALL their guests and doubtless, as with most weddings, managing multiple conflicting demands as tactfully as possible.

It's 'very Alice' not to have considered that the needs and wants of any of the other people in the room, might be of the slightest interest or importance.

SoupDragon · 07/10/2019 10:55

Yes, let's just make stuff up based on no information at all. 🙄

lottiegarbanzo · 07/10/2019 11:06

429 messages, including quite a few 'Alice defenders' is not 'no information at all'. It's a consistent pattern of thought and behaviour.

Of course it does also resonate with the real-life Alice I know.

It's irrelevant whether other guests had actually made special requests. The point is that Alice would never know and 'an Alice', the type, would never have given that a passing thought, or tried to see things from the B&G's point of view.

StillCoughingandLaughing · 08/10/2019 13:41

I am struck by the fact that none of the 'Alices' and 'Alice defenders' on the thread seem to have considered, for a moment, that other guests might also have wanted, even asked for, special treatment too. That Alice might not be the only special person in the room.

I’m SO glad someone else has said this! ‘One extra person’ is rarely where it stops. What happens if there are step-parents involved? Siblings who don’t have roles in the wedding as such, but who would consider themselves a damn sight closer than the best man’s wife? Do THEIR spouses then also get to sit with them? What about if the maid of honour wants her partner with her, or if there are several bridesmaids who all do?

The bride and groom made a simple, clear call on who sat at the top table. That should have been the end of it.

New posts on this thread. Refresh page
Swipe left for the next trending thread