Vanilla, no my objection to men staying overnight is not based on DH being unwilling or unable to stay.
I firmly believe that overnight is often when women feel most vulnerable. Although I'm sure everyone who supports men being there overnight has a DH is considerate and lovely, I have enough self awareness to realise that my lovely DH and other male strangers being so close by might not be as welcome to other women. Women who bleed, are poked and prodded, shit themselves, or have to walk across a toilet spilling clots, sit on a toilet wondering if their stitches will burst. Nursing staff having intimate conversations about your episiotomy wound behind paper thin curtains all in earshot of a bunch of ranfon men. Really?? At least with visiting hours you've got an outside chance of some of these things happening without a crowd of spectators?
So you know what, your lovely DH doing his overnight bonding because you're exhausted and unwell may actually also make some women feel traumatised and horribly exposed. Would that not also cause some women to be more at risk of PND etc? Why do your rights trump theirs?
I stand by my opinion that your right to have your DH with you should never ever make another women feel vulnerable.
I also say that as a mum of boys who lives in a house full of males. I really don't have an agenda against men.
I just feel postnatal spaces should always be female patient spaces outside of visiting hours (vetted and qualified male healthcare staff aside).
Unfortunately not properly staffing hospitals for years has led us to this unfortunate situation. Allowing partners open access is a huge fucking money saving cop out and fails women spectacularly.