Trimummy3
Do they give most of that money to the poorer teams for a new kit whilst your own kit is falling to pieces?
Actually, yes. In most professional sports, the majority of money is generated by the participation of the top teams. (TV revenues, advertising and sponsorship etc.)
This is then distributed to all the teams in the league. It provides the top teams with decent opposition to play against and the supporters of the lower teams add to the overall revenue.
The top teams could take all the money but then the smaller teams would go bust and the top teams wouldn't have enough teams to play against. No fixtures, no more revenue.
This is the point. Ireland was financially supported by the EU for years. This enabled their economy to develop to the point that they now pay more into the EU than they receive back. They are also able to buy and sell more goods which makes money for everyone.
In terms of your own kit falling apart, if you don't make enough money you become a net recipient rather than a net contributor so if your kit is falling apart, the other teams chip in to buy you a new one.
The UK spending on the EU is really not that much in the scale of UK spending and it brings massive trade benefits. Norway pays almost the same as the UK per person but has none of the membership benefits we enjoy.
in 2017, the UK paid £8.9 billion to the EU (about £135 per person). Which sounds like a lot. But it means people don't pay import tax on food, clothing, cars or anything else we buy from the EU. When we move to WTO rules, all these taxes will be paid by us when we buy stuff.
For comparison, we pay about £3636 per person on welfare, £670 on Defence and £2196 on the NHS.