I was with some friends from Belfast recently and we fell to chatting about how such murderous hatred could arise among people who always seem so lovely when you are there.
Then I find threads like this, and others, where people start 'hating', 'despising' etc people who have different views from them, and calling those people some horrible names. And I begin to wonder ...
I see it justified as being a threat to the 'hater's' well being, and sometimes to the country's well being, but that was what was said in NI: the Unionists believed that the Republicans were trying to impose a 'threatening' way of life on them and the Republicans believed the same of the Unionists. Each provided data to back up their arguments. Yet, to an outsider, life in the UK and Ireland don't look so dramatically different, with one intolerable, that it would be worth even considering killing another person to avoid living that life.
My friends are about 50/50 Leave and Remain, but because they are decent, respectful people, they allow the 'other side' to express their opinions. Thus I have repeatedly heard a variety of arguments on both sides. What is striking is that each believes that their 'facts' are correct and the others' 'facts' are just beliefs, based on mistaken interpretation of the data. Upthread, at least one PP used the word 'factually' when s/he expressed her/his beliefs. There is data out there that supports each side of the argument, but, thanks to confirmation bias, each person takes note of what backs up his/her viewpoint and dismisses what shows it to be possibly wrong.
Nobody actually knows what will happen if we leave without A Deal (there are already quite a number of small agreements in place, so it wouln't be deal-less), leave with this deal or that deal, or remain. For each 'expert' on one side there is another on the other.
But all this hatred aimed at people with different opinions. How can that be OK?