People seem to be making their decision based upon how they feel about Europe rather than the actual consequences of leaving.
Leaving isn't the same as never having joined.
The EU are not punishing us.
Imagine the EU is a gym. The UK is a couple cancelling their joint gym membership. This means we will no longer have access to the gym. This is not a punishment, it is just what cancelling our membership entails.
There is a sort of associate membership available but it's terms aren't as good as full membership.
One spouse was adamant that they cancel their gym membership and feels retaining associate membership goes against their agreement to cancel. But they still want to access some of the gym equipment.
The other spouse argued to keep the full membership because they both use it. They feel that associated membership is a bit pointless because the best deal available is the full membership, especially as they got a special early bird discount price when they joined and get a say in how the gym is run (unlike associated members).
Meanwhile it turns out that cancelling the membership isn't straight forward. And both spouses are getting a bit cheesed off at how long the process takes.
But that process is complicated by the UK wanting to still use the gym equipment after cancelling their membership.
The gym, whilst a bit bureaucratic and frustrating isn't really punishing the UK. It just thinks that creating a new non-mebership option which still confers the benefits of membership isn't in the best interests of the rest of the members. It just isn't a reasonable request.
Ok, it's not a perfect analogy. 😂
My favourite is the submarine made of cheese.