There's also the question of religious freedom - I'm an atheist so this isn't something I'm going to get too worked up about, but we can't just dismiss this as 'bigotry' if we're going to also be tolerant of people's religion and beliefs. In a predominantly Muslim school they really need to take care to teach about LGB relationships in a way that is respectful of their belief system - I don't think that the No Outsiders program did that, in fact it seemed to be quite deliberately provocative in challenging their religious orthodoxy and I'm not sure that primary schools are the place to do that.
This too.
I disagree with the protesters but it needs to be recognised that 'religion or belief' is a protected characteristic in the equality act, just as much as 'sexual orientation'. And just as religion cannot be allowed to trump sexual orientation, neither can sexual orientation be allowed to trump religion.
Andrew Moffat says that one of the main aims of the No Outsiders programme is to teach primary school children about the Equality Act 2010. Yet out of the 35 recommended books, none specifically deal with religion or belief.
From Shelley Charlesworth's article:
I’ve read the 35 recommended books and correlated each one, where possible, with the 9 protected characteristics of the Equality Act. This was done on the basis of the content of each book. 17 books could be said to have a link to one of the 9 protected characteristics of the Equality Act.
They are listed here with the number of books that relate to them following in brackets.
Age (1) Disability (3) Gender Reassignment (4) Race (3) Religion or Belief (0) Sex (1) Sexual Orientation (5) Marriage and Civil Partnerships (0) Pregnancy and Maternity (0)
The best that can be said of Andrew Moffat is that he has behaved in a clumsy, thoughtless fashion with no regard to the rights of faith communities.
I suspect he knew what he was doing though.