@2eternities and @Lulu49 your genetic imperative to breed with the optimal chance of producing healthy offspring argument is bollocks when applied to the many, many accounts of pedophilic middle aged men harassing children aged 9-16!
Teenage pregnancy shares a lot of the same risks to mother and baby as pregnancy over the age of 40.
Pregnant teenagers are far more likely to suffer high blood pressure than pregnant adult women in their 20s and 30s. They are more likely to deliver prematurely and to deliver a low birth weight baby.
A teen is still growing and developing herself and it is harder for her body to nourish a growing baby whilst meeting it's own nutritional needs (which are different to an adult woman's). Anemia is a significant risk - more so in teens than adult women.
Young teenage bodies are more likely to suffer catastrophic birth injuries due to their bodies not being fully mature.
Teenagers are also actually less fertile than women in their early 20s - female fertility peeks at 24 on average.
So it is absolute and complete nonsense to explain away pedophiles piercing in girls under 16 by saying that it's hard wired into them due to the biological imperative to reproduce.
If that were true it would be women in their early 20s receiving all the "attention".
Harassing female children and teenagers isn't a hirdwired genetic imperative and isn't about fertility. It's a power play by nasty, inadequate creeps who know full well no woman in her 20s (if they're all about peek fertility, which I don't believe) nor attractive adult woman would give them the time of day, so get their kicks by sexually intimidating biologically and psychologically immature female children.