The 4th one I think is the easiest - it shouldn't be anyone else's business who you choose to sleep with (providing it's legal).
Just because a person is a specific sexuality it doesn't mean that they are willing to sleep with everyone in that category so it is just a redundant question in my view. I'm a heterosexual woman. That doesn't mean that I find all men attractive. I don't have a "type" but even if I did it doesn't mean that I will find every man who is that type attractive so I have no clue how anyone can say that lesbians have to find trans women attractive ( if that is what has been said). Lesbians won't find all other lesbians attractive so how you can select to force anyone to find you attractive now beyond bonkers to me.
The sport issue I think can be solved by keeping it segregated by sex if that is required.
The crime one, depending on the level of detail needed, you could segregated by sex or by male, female, trans male trans female if that detail is needed.
It's the first one that I struggle with.
If you legislate to segregate spaces based on sex you will have males (including trans women) and females (including trans men).
I see it stated a lot that there are two reasons for segregation - safety and privacy/dignity. So, you might keep women safer by segregating but I cannot see how the privacy/dignity aspect can be satisfied if you are expecting women to be sharing spaces with trans men, who, outwardly might look incredibly masculine.
I just don't see how a woman who cannot, or chooses not, to be in a space with a man when she is in a state of undress is going to be comfortable being in the space with a person who looks male, simply because their sex is female.
When I've raised this elsewhere I've had comments like trans men can choose to use mens changing rooms if they want - well, no, they can't if you actually bring in legislation to prevent this can you? If you insist that spaces are segregated on sex alone then you have to accept that this will mean trans men are using changing rooms, toilets, hospital wards etc alongside women. So what then of the women that are regularly cited as at risk of exclusion of trans women are allowed into these spaces? Surely, they will still be excluded but this time by your rules.
I also don't agree with people who have transitioned being forced to basically declare their status every time they venture out into public and need to use a toilet or a changing room and I know that isn't a popular opinion to hold on here. At the very least we need to ensure that we have a third space but quite how this is introduced and accepted by everyone, I don't know.
As for HCP, again, how will we legislate? A female patient requests a female HCP, by the definition of sex a trans man would be female. So, what does a patient do if a trans man comes in to do a smear test for example? If the patient says, no I asked for a female, what's the answer to that?
Do you then have to segregate by sex and by appearance? What language do we use to talk about these scenarios?