CatherineofAragonsPrayerBook I'd hope so. What they really need to do is STOP using universal credit (replacing all tax credits and jsa) as a tool to save save save money due to 'austerity' and actually make it work for the people it is supposed to help - like working single mothers. Right now on UC when anyone switched over they have 5 weeks with no payment at all (!!) and they have to take an 'advance loan' to get through those 5 weeks which is paid back by taking off huge chunks of their payments over the next 12-16 months. If someone claims on an inconvenient date which clashes with their paydates from work, they could lose 1000s of entitlement a year compared to SOMEONE WITH THE EXACT SAME WAGES, RENT, NUMBER OF DC ETC, just because of when they claim. "Too expensive" to fix, according to the dwp in the high court, but they were told it's unlawful. Yet to see any changes. See this -
"Tessa Gregory, solicitor from Leigh Day who represented the first Claimant, Ms Danielle Johnson, stated:
“My client is a hard working single mum doing her very best to support her family. She is precisely the kind of person Universal Credit was supposed to help, yet the DWP designed a rigid income assessment system which left her £500 out of pocket over the year and spiralling into debt due to a fluctuating income. Quite rightly the Court has found that the Secretary of State has been acting unlawfully and ruled that a correct interpretation of the regulations would not lead to such absurd results.
It is extraordinary that when this issue was first raised, the Secretary of State did not act quickly to remedy the problem, instead choosing to fight these four women in court arguing that the system was fit for purpose despite the hardship being caused to working families. This is yet another demonstration of how broken Universal Credit is and why its roll out must be stopped."
See Here for full explanation