I think the issue has always been that the referendum was fundamentally flawed. To my mind it was like asking the country:
Would you like to paint this room:
A) white; or
B) another colour?
Another colour won, fair enough. The question then is which colour? That has been the issue throughout, there is no consensus among "another colour" voters as to which colour they want. Quite a few are insisting that although they ticked "another colour" they actually voted to paint the room blue. But in reality, they didn't. Blue wasn't mentioned by anyone at the time. They might now want to paint the room blue but that doesn't mean it's what they actually voted for. Saying "another colour means blue" doesn't make it true.
If we've now identified that the only colour available is orange it seems sensible to me to say, ok, would you like orange or white? If a sensible majority voted orange then fair enough.
I voted white. Not because I love white or think it's the best colour we could ever hope to have but, based on the question I was asked, it was the most acceptable option to me as it was clearly defined and I knew what it meant.