They all say that the signs were there before children, they just glossed over them.
Yes I think there's a lot of truth in that, for me too.
I suppose that when I was younger, I was taken in by the idea of lurrrve, to an extent (as we are conditioned to, though I suppose you'd say we should all just resist that) and I thought that because I loved ex, and I thought he loved me, that he wouldn't treat me like shit.
Because I wouldn't do that to someone I loved - leave them with 90% of the workload and sit on my arse. So I assumed he wouldn't.
Yes pre DC he was a bit lazy, but I could be lazy too - we could lie in all weekend and leave the dishes and school runs weren't a thing. I assumed, wrongly, that because he was lovely and sweet and funny (as I thought then) and I lurved him, that of course he would behave differently with DC, as of course would I.
In fact I was so sold on the idea that he was lovely really and just needed to understand how much I did and how much needed doing and how unfair it was, that I kept trying to explain this to him and he kept pretending he got it. While fecking off to his important job and hobbies and leaving me in the lurch.
Yes I was a total idiot and it took a long time for the scales to fall from my eyes and by then we had 2 DC. But I'm not alone.
If you have the ability to walk out on your tiny kids and leave them with a selfish twat who'll forget to feed them, refuse to take them to their friends' parties and ignore letters from school, good on you. If I found that too hard to do, it's hard to say how much of that is innate, and how much because of the pressure on women to always be there, provide, take care of everyone etc. which I did feel very strongly.
My point is that all of this unequalness is sanctioned and ingrained by how we are brought up and what we learn to expect. That is the patriarchy at work.