It’s also interesting how some people get so sucked in that they automatically discount any theory other than the one put forward by the mccanns.
Eg when I mentioned that it’s entirely possible that the shutter (which according to KMs book was easily opened from outside) could have been released by some tipsy passer by, a poster described that as far fetched.
Really? In a holiday resort, on a fairly busy road, where people would have been making their way back from bars? There certainly seems to have been quite a culture of drinking (god knows the mccann group sunk enough bottles over the week)
Likewise people who say MM couldn’t possible have wandered off. A bright, active almost 4 year old?
Really? My kids were all capable at this age of getting out of bed, wandering around, opening doors and even unbolting them (not that MM needed to as the doors were unlocked)
So discounting all the entirely plausible events which could have happened, we’re supposed to accept, with no substantiated evidence, that a stranger entered the unlocked apartment through the window, abducted a child and left?
Yes, that’s possible. But so are plenty of other scenarios.
It’s good from the freedom of speech view that these things are at least being discussed, because on past form, MN would have shut down this discussion by now. Having said that, it’s probably only a matter of time....