@Symposium123 You resort to personal insult when you minimise infanticide and LIE about it. You got called out your lies. Many infants (who, incidentally, would have been better off not being born and terminated when they had no brain stem and no nervous system so could not feel pain) have actually been murdered by mothers who should never have given birth in the first place. If Baby P's mother for example, when it was very clear she didn't want her child anyway, had aborted, that little boy would not have been through so much pain, when he could feel pain because was developed and had a nervous system and could ACTUALLY feel pain. There are many infants murdered and slowly and painfully by mothers, for you to so callously minimise it.
And this isn't a difference of opinion. This is about LEGAL definitions. Infanticide is the LEGAL definition of a BORN ACTUAL human being being killed within one year of birth. There is nothing 'opinion' about it.
It is a Legal fact, a Legal definition. You can re-word it to prey on people's emotions all you want, but what you are doing is malicious and deceptive. If you are going to use a Legal English term, use it correctly. Stop thinking you can change hearts and minds by the usual pro-birther/anti-choicer/pro-incubatorial slavery tactics. LYING about the terms. It hasn't worked in all this time, it didn't work in Ireland (where they posted photos of almost fully formed foetuses as an example of your average abortion), you don't get it. You keep repeating the same thing, expecting a different result. You have no moral standing because you have to lie and manipulate and deceive. That should be your first clue you are on the wrong side. You can believe life begins at conception (which science proves it clearly does not), you can believe that cows are ducks. You can believe anything you want to fool yourself into believing. But you cannot use a LEGAL TERM falsely.
It's always a surprise to me that the pro-slavery advocates don't understand that lying is a SIN.