BlooperReel The maid then denied she saw anything and even stole stuff from his house to sell which unfortunately discredits her as a believable witness .
Again, I am not saying he was innocent, I just think more evidence is needed before we can say he is guilty
Granted, but she also says she was threatened, with losing her job, and her life. As for her stealing, being a thief, or tempted by fortune, does not also mean you never tell the truth. No witness is pure and virtuous.
As for evidence, it is historical sex abuse, as others have pointed out, what more evidence, other than witness testimony, would you expect? If it was just MJ and a boy in a room alone, many years' ago, there will be no physical evidence.
I think what needs to be looked at here, is probability. MJ admitted to sharing beds and rooms with young boys, we know that much, and we know it is not usual for a grown man to do this.
We have a maid who says she saw and found things that point towards overly sexual behaviour towards and around young boys.
We have more than one accusation from those who were children and spent copious amounts of time alone with Jackson, even now when the statute of limitations ahve passed meaning they cannot go after his estate for monetary gain.
We have those same men, speaking out despite knowing there are hardcore MJ fans mocking them, vilifying them, calling them liars etc.
On the balance of probability, which is more likely to be the truth:
A grown man is this ethereal, childlike lover of children who just wants to relive his lost childhood.
Or a grown man who was likely sexually abused himself, has a tonne of money and power, has an unhealthy sexual appetite for young boys, grooms them, their families and those around him with lavish gifts, holidays etc, earns their trust and abuses them?
I know where I'd put my money.