But surely someone groomed to commit an atrocity should be treated differently to someone committing it open eyed. Should child soldiers be tried for war crimes in the same way as adults? Was Myra Hindley culpable in the same way that Ian Brady is?
But how do you decide who has been groomed and who is ‘open eyed’? Where does the buck spot? We know Shamima was aware of atrocities before she went and while she was there.
Young white people might well be radicalised online by the far right using very similar methods but I really can’t see you wheeling out your sympathy bandwagon for them
That’s all it is to you, grooming. It’s a convenient excuse for people you want to excuse.
It must be amazing being a liberal leftie. Just waking up every morning, seeing what the issues of the day are thinking what the logical, rational response is and then just doing completely the opposite. Always prioritising the wicked and the harmful above the innocent and harmless.
In answer to your original question, child soldiers are kidnapped from their family and coerced into fighting so they are not culpable for things other people made them do. Shamima was not forced or coerced and she had hundreds if not thousands of chances to stop everything and not going to Syria but she didn’t take them. She is culpable .
Regarding Hindley and Brady, it’s not a fucking league table you know. There isn’t some sort of points system. When two people have as a team killed multiple children, it doesn’t matter who is worst or more to blame, the only thing that mattters is that they are two very evil people who needed to be locked away forever.