I think you should state which version of Marxism you follow then, remember Marx himself said he wasn't a Marxist, and his most famous unpublished letter
www.marxists.org/history/etol/newspape/ni/vol01/no04/marx.htm
Let me draw your attention to a specific line at the end of that first paragraph:
In different passages of Capital, I have made allusion to the fate which overtook the plebeians of ancient Rome.
If you look in your English language copy of Capital you will never find such an allusion. It consists of a single footnote which Marx added to Capital when he made a French translation of Volume I.
Other than a few stray corrections borrowed from the French by Engels after Marx's death, that revised French edition has never been rendered into English, even after 150 years.
This is the famous unpublished letter where Marx basically does an about-face and renounces dialectical materialism. He never wrote anything else remotely like this. Nearly all strains of "Marxism" which consider themselves to present Marx's orthodox thought, e.g. Western Marxism, Marxism-Leninism, Maoism, and Trotskyism, would find this late Marx a total alien to them.
Marx gives us some tools for diagnosing systemic social flaws, but we are living in a very different era and we need to learn how to separate those tools from the failed pseudoreligion of dialectical materialism.
So until you can offer anything other than fuzzy thinking, then it's a capitalism with restrictions