It went on from 12 til 6 - there was the service, a drinks reception lunch, and then it ended. So nothing in the evening - no dancing or anything
What's wrong with that? Not everyone has the money to put or wants a two-tiered wedding. Britain is one of the few cultures that does that two-tiered thing. A lot of places, you get married late in the afternoon or even later to much later and go straight to the meal and reception.
I think it's great! No getting up at stupid o'clock to spend the entire fucking day and evening at a wedding. No need to spunk more money on a hotel the night before because the wedding's so damn early. No guessing if the guests have had time for lunch.
Similarly, in many places a lot of the photos are done before the wedding (again, works well if you have a wedding later in the afternoon) so there's no taking hours and hours to have them all done.
I've been to small weddings that were teetotal (the bride and groom were members of the Free Kirk of Scotland) and lovely. It was fab, ceremony at noon, to the church hall for sandwiches, sausage rolls, pork pies and plenty of other nibbles. Tea and coffee. Then cake cut and wedding over. Whew, that was great, no spending hours and hours mostly being bored, seating plans, waiting for food or food running out, listening to speeches (those are always so naff or terrible and really NO ONE CARES, they just want to eat) and best of all, no tacky cash gift requests because the couple haven't lived together before marriage.