Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

AIBU?? Partner living in my house for free but it's crippling me financially

608 replies

Moneys2Tight2Mention · 09/01/2019 09:39

This may be long!!!!

I didn’t think I was being unreasonable but the reaction I have received from my boyfriend makes me feel like I have been!

I live in a mortgaged (interest only – this is relevant) house. The deposit was given to me by my parents and I cover all bills/mortgage etc. I went through a really tough time last year and my boyfriend of three months ended up staying over a lot. That has gone from “staying over a lot” to never actually going home and he has lived in the property rent free for the best part of a year now. He used to live with (and is officially registered at) his parents rent-free at their large house. I have never asked for a penny in rent etc and I have actually said to him on occasion when he has offered me a token gesture that it costs me the same whether he’s there or not and I don’t want his money.

He is very generous with me, when we go out he pays for absolutely everything. He often picks up dinner etc on the way home and I rarely have to pay for any food shopping. We have a good social life and are always out and about, he will rarely let me pay for anything despite the fact that I insist on occasion! He is self-employed and takes home a good wage. He puts a lot of money into savings every month.

Recently I have had an increase in outgoings elsewhere in my life. My work have also cut my hours and it’s got to the point where I am struggling financially. Yesterday I wrote down all of my outgoings and realised that they total a lot more than my take home wage therefore I am cutting into savings every month just to get by.

I had a conversation with him about this last night, I worked out that all in the house costs me £1200 a month (interest only mortgage and bills) and asked him for a small amount of money (suggested £100 a week) to help me out so I’m not always dipping into savings every month.

What ensued was really surprising to me!! He said that essentially he didn’t want to hand over money like that as he would be “paying off my mortgage” (interest only for the record – however he did not know this) for me. He threw back in my face that I always said that it costs the same to have him here than to not, and that he could just live at home for free so why would he pay me rent. He also said that if he paid me £100 a week and we had an argument, that he wouldn’t be entitled to anything back and would have essentially “lost” that money and be “throwing it away”.

I explained that my house is actually on an interest only mortgage as that’s all I can afford currently, so I am essentially not paying off my mortgage either, however have been “throwing away” £1200 for the pair of us to have a roof over our heads for the last year. I said that even if he gave me £100 tomorrow, he would have still had a year of “free living” from me so would no way be out of pocket. He also said he didn’t want to rent so that he could save money every month for “our future” – which is very well and good however I am draining my savings just so that he can live rent-free… I am going into the red every month whilst he furnishes his savings account.

We argued back and forth about this for about an hour and in the end he begrudgingly agreed to pay me the £100 a month. I can tell he’s unhappy about this and I am therefore unhappy about this too. There’s a huge elephant in the room today and we both have a bitter taste in our mouths and a sense of unfairness.

AIBU??? Should I just ask him for half the bills instead?

Thanks all

OP posts:
IDECLAREBANKRUPTCY · 11/01/2019 23:23

The only way paying for food and social outings is generous is if you don't live together. If you live together you pay bills. You know, the stuff that keeps you warm and washed and a roof over your head. If only life was as easy as just paying food and dinners!

Smallhorse · 12/01/2019 01:30

Well said marymcarthy

brookshelley · 12/01/2019 02:01

The partner was seeing himself as her boyfriend who treated her on nights out, in return for staying over. He didn't view himself as living with her officially. It had just evolved into being convenient and fun for them both for him to stay. He hadn't in his eyes felt he'd made a commitment to her whereas she assumed he had.

100% agree with this. If he was committed to OP and wanted to be with her for the long-term, they wouldn't be arguing over the money. He didn't want to pay because he didn't see a future with her, that's why they've broken up. Not because of 100 quid a week.

Robin2323 · 12/01/2019 04:38

I think op was claiming 25 less council tax because she said officially he was living with his parents.
Either way in the end he had offered to pay.
She said with further discussion
They had decided to split up.
Who really know why. What was actually said.

It's just sad they couldn't have worked through this because many people do.
Remember he had offered to pay right from the start but op said no.
Yes op will save money on electric but lost on food. Getting rid has not helped financially.
I hope they manage to talk and sort this out.
It maybe that having a bit of space they gives them chance to work this out. I have experienced this and seen it happen many times and supported others through it.

WH1SPERS · 12/01/2019 09:46

The partner was seeing himself as her boyfriend who treated her on nights out, in return for staying over. He didn't view himself as living with her officially. It had just evolved into being convenient and fun for them both for him to stay. He hadn't in his eyes felt he'd made a commitment to her whereas she assumed he had

I think there’s a lot of truth in this. However I think that the OP was perfectly reasonable to think that they were living together since they were actually living together.

I’m not sure how “ living together “ could actually be defined, apart from you know actually living in the same house and having your clothes and personal belongings there.

What would make it “ official “? Having a living together ceremony ? Putting an announcement in the paper ?

I think it’s unfair on the OP to suggest that this was just a misunderstanding, that her ex was just a simple lad who didn’t understand and it’s probably her fault for not being clear enough.

As far as I can see, the BF managed to reap all the benefits of living together, ( practical, financial, emotional , social, sexual ). It was “convenient and fun” for him but was “ crippling her financially”.

Yet when he was called on it to make an appropriate contribution, suddenly it was just a casual fun thing , where the OP had all the responsibility and the Bf had none. She was “ changing the terms”.

That’s such a female thing to do isn’t it ? We are socialised to be kind , generous and reasonable, to put others first and assume they will treat us the same. Not to push men into a commmittment because they are so fragile and delicate , it will scare them. Then when we finally ask for them to act like an adult, we are the controlling witches who changed the terms of the deal Hmm.

Robin2323 · 12/01/2019 09:50

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

Robin2323 · 12/01/2019 09:53

Sorry wrong thread

Edgeworth · 12/01/2019 23:09

The partner was seeing himself as her boyfriend who treated her on nights out, in return for staying over. He didn't view himself as living with her officially. It had just evolved into being convenient and fun for them both for him to stay. He hadn't in his eyes felt he'd made a commitment to her whereas she assumed he had.
I don't agree since he offered to contribute off the bat, but OP said no. He also agreed to contribute after the recent discussion.

New posts on this thread. Refresh page