Meet the Other Phone. Protection built in.

Meet the Other Phone.
Protection built in.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Twitter hosts paedophiles- AIBU to think this should change?

315 replies

SmileEachDay · 05/01/2019 10:10

pedrapapeletesoura.wordpress.com/2017/09/14/map-starting-guide/

A growing number of MAP (minor attracted people) accounts are forming a network on Twitter. There is a push to normalise and legitimise being sexually attracted to children. The “guide” I have linked is chilling, as are the accounts with MAP tags - they often have AOA in their bio...their “age of attraction”. So AOA 6mnths-4 years is a sexual attraction to children of that age.

Twitter is a huge business, with enormous power - they could, if they chose, take a stand against this.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
23
BubonicWoman · 06/01/2019 14:46

Qcng
Thanks

SmileEachDay · 06/01/2019 14:51

They are coming down...

But no public statement from Twitter yet...

Twitter hosts paedophiles- AIBU to think this should change?
OP posts:
SmileEachDay · 06/01/2019 16:28

A response from someone who has paedophile =/= rape in their bio.

Twitter hosts paedophiles- AIBU to think this should change?
OP posts:
Justanotherlurker · 06/01/2019 17:08

4chan have been highlighting this for a few years but because it was 4chan it was filed under bigot territory because they have are trying to attach themselves under the LBGQT banner, especially in US circles.

Because it has infiltrated under the LBGQT flag is suspected why they are slow to take down (and they do have a history of that with our very own PIE), men and women wearing MAP badges has been spotted on pride marches in the US for the past few years, along with banners and flyers. There is a lot of conspiracy around this from it being some right wing infiltration, or 4chan stirring up the usual shite , but considering the awareness has come about from 4chan initially pokes holes in that and shows what a shit show it all is.

NonExistentFox · 06/01/2019 17:40

then to have it derailed by the AWA to make it all about trans, like everything has to be about them

This is supposed to be about paedophilia. You make everything you can "about trans". It took the OP all of two posts.

As I see it - If you're a threat to women and children then we will keep pointing that out.

If they're "honour" murderers, forced marriage abusers, sex traffickers or paedophiles who don't exploit trans issues, it's less urgent to you than a drag queen with a storybook.

Datun · 06/01/2019 17:50

Amazing the whataboutery AMA's go for. If we are talking about trans, you ask why we don't talk about paedophiles. If we're talking about paedophiles you asked why we not talking about sex traffickers.

The specific drag queens that are currently going into kindergartens, have said that the aim is to teach three-year-olds about hate speech. One of these drag queens had the name poppin' cherry.

They absolutely should be nowhere near children.

SmileEachDay · 06/01/2019 17:52

non

You can keep voicing your opinions about my intentions, I’m not going to police you.

Twitter need to get their act together - still no statement re child abuse. Two accounts I reported are still there. There is an account by a “MAP ally” with pictures of a clearly young teen girl on - semi nudes and links to the “real pictures”. Another account which is posting nudes of young looking girls. It’s a cesspit. With a very anti woman agenda.

OP posts:
NothingOnTellyAgain · 06/01/2019 17:58

"If they're "honour" murderers, forced marriage abusers, sex traffickers or paedophiles who don't exploit trans issues"

YY women > esp feminists >> are well known for not caring about any of that.

Got anything a bit more, um, convincing?

SmileEachDay · 06/01/2019 19:20

Thank you for reinstating those posts MNHQ

OP posts:
Penguincake · 06/01/2019 21:10

Smile I talked to MNHQ about them and after a small discussion they agreed to reinstate.

NonExistentFox · 06/01/2019 21:38

YY women > esp feminists >> are well known for not caring about any of that.

Got anything a bit more, um, convincing?

How about the first hundred threads on FWR? I'll leave you to spot Wenda.

Twitter hosts paedophiles- AIBU to think this should change?
Twitter hosts paedophiles- AIBU to think this should change?
NonExistentFox · 06/01/2019 21:49

Sorry -

ibb.co/HrpCQxh

ibb.co/B2tN7gK

I think there were a few hours a few days ago where none of the first five threads were trans threads but posterity missed that.

Datun · 06/01/2019 23:03

Really fox? You think because we are waiting to hear the results of the GRA consultation, we can't think about anything else?

How about this actual thread, which you are, yet again, derailing with your nonsense?

What do you think about the influx of paedophiles colonising Twitter? How do you think they might be exploiting the transgender ideology in order to access children?

GlitterStick · 06/01/2019 23:26

To be fair it did turn out pretty quickly to not just be a Twitter paedophile thread at all and the two being conflated by page 1 or 2.
Was quick what it was really about.
Can see Foxes point where they say there's not really anything in FWR that's not trans related - very, very few and far between any other issues

Datun · 06/01/2019 23:50

glitter

What do you think about the influx of paedophiles colonising Twitter? How do you think they might be exploiting the transgender ideology in order to access children?

NonExistentFox · 07/01/2019 01:50

Amazing the whataboutery AMA's go for. If we are talking about trans, you ask why we don't talk about paedophiles.

On a thread you keep insisting should focus on paedophiles?! How very dare we.

What do you think about the influx of paedophiles colonising Twitter? How do you think they might be exploiting the transgender ideology in order to access children?

I've explained to you before, Datun, that a question which uses a string of debatable conjectures as its premise is a cheap rhetorical trick which you can't expect me to fall for, and that if you aren't willing or able to evince some more scrupulous reasoning you will have to rely on more indulgent PWDWY to flatter your vanity.

Penguincake · 07/01/2019 08:44

Non existent fox and glitter why are you still trying to stop us discussing paedophiles? Why do you not want them scrutinised?

We know your views are that Trans do not equal paedophilies and we completely agree with you. Some have just pointed out that some pedos are trying to jump onto trans coattails and it is abhorrent.

If you are now trying to derail the thread into a conversation about too many trans threads, then I cannot help but conclude that you have a personal agenda in trying to stop people shining a light on pedo activities.

Datun · 07/01/2019 09:30

fox

More defensive word salad.

As I said I guarantee you have nothing useful to add about this new phenomena sweeping Twitter. You simply can't bring yourself to discuss it, can you?

It's more important to you to try and find a gotcha to shore up your argument (whatever that is, you're remarkably cagey about it). When the gotcha you're seeking is the actual point.

Why do you think left leaning feminists, who traditionally champion every minority going, are suddenly the opposite with the trans ideology? Think about it.

Is it because they are personally affronted by a handful of men with gender dysphoria? No. It's because it's a misogyny magnet. A predator magnet, a paedophile magnet.

David Challinor, convicted child rapist and torturer advised political parties on their trans safeguarding. Karen White, a paedophile being sent to a female prison. A Canadian individual interested in the menstruation of children, having untold influence across social media. Being photographed with the founder of the very platform who is hosting these disgusting men.

Only possible because of the transgender ideology.

Jane Fae Interested in lowering the legal age of the participants of extreme pornography, advising the government on their trans equality report. And the girl guides equality policy, ffs.

Umpteen transactivists targeting children and offering 'sanctuary' from their parents.

And official lobbyists and proponents of the ideology clamouring to give minors full body autonomy.

And the women who point this out are being shut down, kicked off platforms and silenced.

You complaining about people seeing how the trans ideology is being exploited makes you part of the problem.

NonExistentFox · 07/01/2019 10:07

I had money on "word salad". Either that's a specious insult, or what I said is genuinely unintelligible to you in which case I can try to say it more simply, or you can just sit back and let your allies insinuate that anyone who takes issue with your approach must be a paedophile.

Why do you think left leaning feminists, who traditionally champion every minority going, are suddenly the opposite with the trans ideology? Think about it.

Well, take Anne Marie Waters, for example. She was never a liberal, she was just lazily designated as such because she's a mouthy lesbian. My guess is that these particular "left leaning feminists"' liberalness was an accident of circumstance, they hit middle age and found themselves overtaken by the resurgence of reactionary politics.

Datun · 07/01/2019 10:25

Well your guess is wrong.

Instead of using ideas and guesses, why don't you actually tell me what you think of David Challinor, Karen White, Jane Fae, the Canadian individual, etc. And explain why you disagree that it's the trans ideology that is giving them license?

Datun · 07/01/2019 10:27

what I said is genuinely unintelligible to you

Well yes. As I said, you're not the best communicator in the world.

NonExistentFox · 07/01/2019 11:13

Well yes. As I said, you're not the best communicator in the world.

OK, then. Put simply: firstly, your question was a loaded question and typical of your attempts to browbeat an argument, and secondly, your allies seem to find such specious debating tactics impressive but I don't, and I'd rather not encourage you by responding.

en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Loaded_question

www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/specious

And on AIBU there are impartial readers who will know whether I'm unintelligible not.

Datun · 07/01/2019 11:51

Asking you about those individuals who are leveraging the trans-ideology to further their agenda, was a very simple question.

And yet

I guarantee you have nothing useful to add about this new phenomena sweeping Twitter.

DitaVonPeas · 07/01/2019 12:11

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

GlitterStick · 07/01/2019 12:26

Paedophiles should be banned from Twitter. Agreed

Same, sickening that they're allowed on there or anywhere.

Yes this is MN yes we're mostly women and mothers but we're not stupid

Amen to that! You're quick to get called stupid or that you "don't understand" if you don't go along with any trans hate though, seen it plenty before