BertrandRussell
Thjs is an example of the sort of half argument that needs to be made. Women are not God. I'm not even slightly religious but the plain and very obvious reality is that the foetus in my womb does not become something other than what it already was if I change my mind about it. No one is buying this as a moral justification for abortion.
I am yet to hear of a compelling moral argument for abortion outside of extreme cases involving rape and abuse. If it's due to a contraception failure then as I said earlier on, your sexual desire combined with not wanting to be pregnant does not morally justify killing something. There is some hand wringing about what exactly is being killed and the nonsense about it only having value if the mother decrees it.
Having someone else perform a complex procedure on your body is nothing to do with bodily autonomy, that's another logic fail.
I believe (despite being pro choice to a limited degree) that there is no moral justification for abortion outside of extreme cases, there just isn't. It can be acceptable to some due to the grey areas about when life begins, so it doesn't seem obviously wrong. Late term abortion fails this test, since most people do regard it (in general) as obviously wrong..hence why the law is actually spot on IMO.
All of the other stuff like "only the uterus owner get a say on what happens with their body" quickly fail the socratic method e.g. commmercial surrogacy or the willingness of medical staff etc etc, the numerous laws that exist constraining what I can put in my body or do with it.
There is no moral justification for killing something just because you wanted to have sex, but don't want to be pregnant. Someone asked earlier about contraception, I'm all for that and don't consider it in any way a moral issue.