Proclaiming Russia's innocence in Eastern Europe is a bit silly. EU expanding eastwards is presumably referencing the states on Russia's frontier (including Finland incidentally) which rejected the Iron Curtain and have been asking for European assistance ever since.
The point is that EU territory needs defending, as do we all. Does Britain now want to turn it's back and let Russia do what it wants or assist our European allies in keeping the diversity of Europe secure?
I’m just aghast someone could put these two comments in the same statement and not see the massive hypocrisy.
Why on earth do you think it’s okay for the EU to want to defend itself but you condemn Russia and say they’re bad for doing exactly the same thing by seeking to prevent the EU from expanding to it’s border.
The USSR was another organisation that used hostile tactics to coerce countries to stay in its sphere. We certainly would have been very worried indeed if they had expanded that sphere to our border. I’m not sure why you can’t understand why Russia wouldn’t feel the same.
I certainly wouldn’t be happy about an expansionist state run by a drunk who has to be hidden from view after lunchtime because he so pissed extending into a state next to me.
As for the EU having armed capabilities, do you do you really fancy a drunk with his finger on the nuclear button? He was falling over drunk at a conference with the leaders of African countries yesterday. And you really can’t see why Russia would be nervous about that man controllining armies on their border?
So you believe the EU is so nice nobody could possibly be reasonably scared of them. Yet their currently threatening to essentially blockade us and deny us essential supplies if we leave? Threatening to destroy us economically if we don’t do as they tell us? And you think they are nice benign people who can be trusted?
Crazy.