er ok pedro 
the reason I "jumped" on the poster, and the reason I am also going to "jump" on greentulips is because they are talking bollocks.
they took one thing I had said and twisted it so that it appeared I was saying something else entirely.
"I do not plan to tell my children Santa is real = I think you should tell your toddlers of their past trauma because I believe they should be told the truth about everything" - no, I did not say that.
leaving out some information until children are at such an age to sensibly process it is not lying. "How did I get here mummy?" "mummy and daddy made you and you grew in my tummy" is not lying (it's very twee but about right for such small children as mine.)
i have not told them that we got drunk, took our clothes off, i lay naked ... etc. not telling them information like that is clearly being sensible, not lying.
with adopted toddlers, you would obviously say something like "unfortunately your birth mum (or whatever phrase you want to use) could not look after you, so daddy and I were shown a photograph of you and we just loved your beautiful blue eyes (delete as appropriate) and eventually brought you home."
now obviously that story would be "added" to but at no point is omitting some information lying, it is completely not the same as the Santa "story."
It is up to every parent what they do; personally i do believe that honesty is vital and all the more so if adoption or similar (child born through donated eggs or sperm) is the case but it is just my view. I do object though to having my words twisted.