shady tactics from the EU?
I'm sorry but I can't let that go.
The EU explained the agreed position openly from the very outset. By contrast the whole U.K. process has been so shrouded in secrecy that the PM has kept things to a very close circle even excluding her own cabinet. Just a few examples...In the U.K. the government has taken the following shady steps:
• They tried to hide the impact assessments ( David Davis denied they existed, then conceded they did. Then when forced they were made available in s secret room with MPs phones confiscated.) The EU ones were available publicly on the website.
• Our govt also spent millions on a court case trying to avoid open debate and a vote to trigger Article 50 in Parliament.
• Then the govt brought in unprecedented since Henry VIII powers to enable individual ministers to privately legislate without normal open parliamentary process.
• In private TM clearly said To Goldman Sachs "The economic arguments are clear,” Companies would leave the UK if the UK left the EU. In public, however she kept her views about the economic consequences of Brexit quiet, so that the Conservative right would accept her as leader if Cameron lost.
The whole process has been shrouded in secrecy so that we don't fully realise how difficult and expensive the U.K. will become to live. By contrast the EU have communicated openly with all 27 member states and the people living there .
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/STUD/2017/595374/IPOLSTU(2017)5953744_EN.pdf