Can people post direct links to all these so called studies then
Because a study in 2016 will be contradicted with another newer study in 2018 etc so always go by the newest medical journal
Well that's OK you don't have to believe any of it
Because obvs your opinion trumps meta analysis of population level studies
For example
epc2014.princeton.edu/papers/140098
Summary here - obvs as it's a 2016 example it must be inaccurate
www.independent.co.uk/life-style/many-parents-will-say-kids-made-them-happier-they-re-probably-lying-a7124851.html
"In research that will published in the American Journal of Sociology, Jennifer Glass of the University of Texas, Robin Simon of Wake Forest University and Matthew Andersson of Baylor University looked at an expansive data set from 22 European and English-speaking countries to find out how and why parents and non-parents in individual countries rate their happiness.
"The cultural stories about parenthood are that it's wonderful, children are great, it's the best thing that happens to us. So why do we actually see these gaps? That's what motivated the research," says Glass.
The key to their findings is that not every country experiences a "parenting happiness gap" like the United States does. On average, an American parent reports being 12 percent unhappier than a non-parent in America the biggest gap in the 22 countries the researchers looked at, followed distantly by Ireland. In 12 other countries, non-parents also described themselves as happier than parents. However, in eight countries Portugal, Hungary, Spain, Norway, Sweden, Finland, France and Russia -- parents actually reported being happier than non-parents.Jennifer Glass of the University of Texas, Robin Simon of Wake Forest University and Matthew Andersson of Baylor University looked at an expansive data set from 22 European and English-speaking countries to find out how and why parents and non-parents in individual countries rate their happiness.
But it's only studies of 22 OECD countries so must be wrong - because people in your line of work lie
And it's only consistent with earlier research as well
i.stuff.co.nz/life-style/parenting/88842957/The-parent-trap-Why-child-free-people-are-happier
"A 2015 report published in American journal Demography found that the effect of a new baby on a person's life in the first year is worse than divorce, unemployment and even the death of a partner.”
"A YouGov survey conducted last year found that one in five German mothers regretted parenthood, with 44 per cent saying parenthood had a negative impact on their professional careers.”
I am someone that desperately wants children, I am not anti having children, the fact I can't have children has been a source of deep depression - but I'm not so self centred as to believe anyone who doesn't share my feelings must be lying
people do weigh up if they should have a baby or not it's called... abortion and having the right to choose
They decide whether to have a baby or not. It's not the norm for people to question why they want a baby or to assess whether they think they would make a good parent. Simply wanting a baby is usually enough because it's 'natural’.
Do you routinely get challenged as to why you decided to have children, and why you thought you would make a good parent?
If the op was happy? why even ask if it's ok. It would just be ok with her, no need to question it!
I may have missed this, but I don't think OP hasn't said whether she is childfree by choice or childless by circumstance...?
She may be childfree by choice and questioning, she may be childless by circumstance and weighing things up
But you're not talking about the OP. You're saying everyone on this thread who has chosen not to have children must be lying or in denial