I am guessing that what the op and some posters are referring to as 'narrow mindedness' and 'bigotry' is the genuine frustration and anger by women at being expected to tolerate the intolerable and not being accepting and 'nurturing' as they supposed to do.
The thing is that a lot of all this echoes what women have to go through; being asked to accept the unacceptable, being ignored or talked down to. I have nothing at all against genuine transsexuals and would like them to be free to live their lives in peace - but I don't believe their rights trump women's rights to safety, comfort and respect.
I don't think all men are the enemy - with a DS, DH, DF and DB I would be in a bad way if I believe that. But I have lived long enough to have had a basinful of being patronised, 'mansplained' and talked down to - and that's before I even talk about the physical threat let alone actual physical harm I have faced. And it's a rare and lucky woman who hasn't experienced much the same, from a significant minority of men.
It all has a familiar ring to it you see; for all the trans activists claim to be women they behave more like these men in the way they try to ensure women are disregarded and shouted down and if that doesn't work, actively threatened. It is wearily familiar:
Men telling women what they should do;
Men defining for women who they are ('ciswomen') without consulting women;
Men blocking discussion with women about things that most nearly concern them, and conducting the discussion instead over their heads;
Men (literally) muscling in on women's private spaces;
Men threatening women with rape/violence if they don't comply ('Suck my lady dick!'/abuse and threats on social media etc)
Hmm...I rack my brains to think of historical precedents for all of that. And the worst is, some of the people who support this have the effrontery to describe themselves as feminists.