In thinking having more than 5 sexual partners doesn't make you a raging whore bag?

[fifithefoof]

Following on from the last thread .....

ftfoawygtfosm you do understand that most people have best friends who they also share problems with, even those in their relationships. People for some reason are uncomfortable calling a sexual relationship by its name.

Soup if having sex causes the bond to be broken then it is based at least partially on sex. Shees.

no lornar the 'bond' isn't BASED on sex it's based on all sorts of emotional connections and trust. The trust is there because we have specifically committed to each other and our relationship is based on a mutual agreement of this commitment which includes monogamy. I would be hurt by a partner being unfaithful because if he's my partner then we have both committed and agreed to a mutual monogamous commitment. it's not the actual sex that's upsetting but the fact that they have broken the trust and the commitment and monogamy agreed as part of the relationship.

Lornar. I have a best friend, as you categorise it. But it’s not remotely the same level of support and emotional connection as I have with Mr FTF.

I have a sexual relationship with Mr FTF.

Part of that is not just the sexual, it’s also the relationship. And I value that more than I value any other friendship relationship.

keep on flogging this horse rather than a genuine and fundamental lack of understanding of humankind.

It is a lack of understanding as per above. Let's suppose the bond was not broken, but your partner asked you first. That would hurt equally. I wouldn't ask or expect someone to be exclusive about something nthat I DID NOT THINK WAS IMPORTANT

Jacques, you claim to be in a sexual relationship with a man you like, find hot and with whom you have "amazing" sex. Including kissing. This has been going on for longer than many marriages, but you also claim to have formed no bond to the man what so ever. IME this is decidedly strange and your demand that I must unquestionably accept something that is at odds with anything i have seen or heard of is unreasonable.

But if you say so.

And you seem to think you could replace him in heartbeat. Despite him being

1. A friend
2. Hot.
3. Single
4. Wants to fuck you.
5. Happy with a sex only relationship.

lornar123

If you’d applied the critical reading skills we discussed earlier you would have seen it’s a distance thing. No way is it “longer than most marriages”. We see each other sporadically, maybe once a month for a weekend.

your demand that I must unquestionably accept something that is at odds with anything i have seen or heard of is unreasonable

And yet, we have to unquestionably accept your position?

Your obsession with my personal life including your drunken nonsense last night is utterly bizarre.

I ask again, as a basic courtesy please don’t misascribe my situation. I was very clear it is an arrangement and not a relationship - I don’t need you to understand, but accusations of dishonesty are ultimately very childish.

Lololololololol!!

I've had MANY friends with benefits/fuck buddy situations in my life.

It really isn't difficult to find a man who's more than happy for this arrangement.

Get out and meet some actual people @lornar123

*And you seem to think you could replace him in heartbeat. Despite him being

1. A friend
2. Hot.
3. Single
4. Wants to fuck you.
5. Happy with a sex only relationship*

1. Not essential
2. Yes, there needs to be attraction
3. Not difficult
4. Not difficult
5. Not difficult.

Most people would be hurt and upset that their partner wanted to have sex with someone else... those are the primary emotions I feel, not disappointment that he broke some unspoken promise.

There are legions of women who cannot find handsome, pleasant men to fuck them, especially once they reach a certain age. Your assertion that it is a piece of loss to find such a man to have amazing sex with is nothing short of ridiculous. Maybe you can pop into relationships and explain how simple it is there.

Piece of piss

There are legions of women who cannot find handsome, pleasant men to fuck them, especially once they reach a certain age

I ask again, how old do you think I am?

Your assertion that it is a piece of loss to find such a man to have amazing sex with is nothing short of ridiculous

It’s a piece of loss (sic) to find a man to fuck. You only know if it’s amazing afterwards. You do know how sex works right?

There are legions of women who cannot find handsome, pleasant men to fuck them.

That's quite likely to be you if you're as big an ass in real life as you are on here. 

As an aside Lorna, you’ve been really useful over the last couple of days, I’ve got a couple of blog posts for a client out of you.

Why do they need to be handsome? Hot doesn’t equal handsome?

I’m old and fat and really not all that and I get plenty of offers even when I’m not looking so I suspect it isn’t that hard to get no strings sex

Why do they need to be handsome? Hot doesn’t equal handsome?

Totally this. FWB isn’t handsome, I wouldn’t even call him good looking. He’s hot though.

Fifi I don't think that's a problem. I have plenty of offers.

Until you get..... *shudders older. 

But I am aware that north of 35 most desirable men are taken.

Maybe you can pop into relationships and explain how simple it is there.

You're still not getting it do you? I doubt many posters in relationships are looking for a no strings sex arrangement.
And there's a difference between having sex with someone and being in a relationship with someone. You might be unable to accept that, but that doesn't make it any less true.

Hahaha

Mr FTF is very “desirable”. He’s good looking he’s gainfully employed own house and car he can cook and he can iron.

What’s not to like?

🤣🤣🤣

Yes Mr Foof is pretty desirable too.

He used to model, built our house (and wired it and did the plumbing), does most of the cooking and is an amazing cook, is a staunch feminist, an amazing Father with endless patience, buys me thoughtful gifts for no specific reason, is funny, is one of the most intelligent people I've ever met, I could go on.

Met him upwards of 35. 🤷‍♀️🧓🏼

Being a hussy didn't work out too badly for me.